In 2005, Google’s exec team (Larry, Sergey, etc) had a weekly product review meeting. We had launched Google Maps in February, and by summer, we’d integrated satellite imagery from our Keyhole (aka Google Earth) acquisition and were ready to launch — so we set up a launch review.
There was a geeky holy war on the Maps team. When Lars checked in the code to switch between maps and imagery, he called it “Satellite.” We were quickly informed that a significant % of the images were taken from airplanes — “Aerial Photography.” Our name was factually incorrect.
Being the product pragmatist I am, I thought, who cares? “Aerial Photography” doesn’t fit on a button, and every person in our usability study got what “Satellite” meant. Unfortunately, to the Keyhole GIS engineers, we were basically destroying humanity with our lies.
I could not resolve the disagreement before our launch review, so we come into the meeting room with an unnamed feature. As you might expect, the meeting devolved from a “launch review” to every Google exec and their mother naming the feature on our behalf. 🙄
Now, these exec reviews were Larry and Sergey’s favorite place to experiment with crazy meeting ideas (kind of fun, actually). I had attended one review where one founder spent the entire meeting on an elliptical machine. Their new experiment was a huge countdown clock.
The rule was: the review had to end on time. When the clock ticked zero, the buzzer would buzz, and like an NBA game, the meeting was over and decisions final.
So here we are, throwing out names like “Airplane View,” “Superman,” “I Feel Picture-y,” and this clock is ticking down
I think it was Sergey who spoke last. “Let’s call it Bird Mode.” Bzzzzzzzz.
I start to speak and am cut off — meeting over.
I look around, and it’s clearly evident the feature has officially been named “Bird Mode” in the most insane way possible.
We spend the next few days freaking out. We knew the feature was going to be huge, and now it had this name that everyone on both sides of the Satellite-vs-Aerial-Photography war agreed was silly and horrible. But it was *decided*.
So what do we do?
It turns out, when you write the code, you have a fair amount of power. 😏
We pocket vetoed the decision and launched with “Satellite.” And literally no exec noticed or remembered our review.
And we have been deceiving people with our not-really-satellite imagery ever since.
"Aerial" is shorter than "Satellite" and as easily understood. For your argument to hold weight instead of be a strawman, you have to compare "Satellite Photography" with "Aerial Photography."
I would be confused by aerial. (I’d be annoyed by thinking about antennas/antennae) Aerial photography is fine but long. Satellite works without photography.
Ah, the value-add of an executive bored with meetings and inventing ways to be entertained. I remember that elliptical, it seemed profoundly disrespectful to the employees in meetings with them.
When we used imagery fr different satellites to look at things (during the first Gulf War) we referred to them as “overhead imagery”. It was a combination of imagery fr satellites, as well as, recon aircraft. In looking at Google data, it is obvious what is sat & what is aerial.
Naming takes no talent or effort to do badly.
At least with design or photography there is a tiny enough learning curve to be able to do it all that people don't think they already know how to do it better.
In taking the lower ground for you, Sergey got you the compromise that should have been attained in the first place. Classic case of an out-of-fringe element expanding the core. 💪
Well it's not that. Its actually because we have been selling ourselves all or lives in different ways n forms so we become experts in marketing as well as sales. Sales comes naturally to us so does marketing
OH in a meeting from a marketing executive to an engineering leader: "that's a fine marketing opinion. When is your next engineering meeting that I can derail with semi-informed code opinions unsupported by data?"
Uncomfortable pause.
(continues) "what is your stance on tabs?"
OMGUH™️. & NOW I—A BLOGGER WHO STARTED ON BLOGGER & BEGAN UTILIZING FLICKR FOR PHOTOGRAPHY—AM NOW WHAT I CALL A 🎶♾SOCIALMEDIAARTIST👁🗨 from the blue screen of death to the iPhone home screen: #
Best,
JillWrites: BA, MA, MFAW
40something Adult Child of Career IT/Net Exec👶
Wise decision since satellite is also way easier to localize to different languages – an aspect which I think should be thought of much more. Bird view would have been Vogelperspektive in German.
Perfect for an episode! These are the moments that product people never forget, the decisions that define products and more so the way users experience game changing functionality. Can’t wait to get these experiences on the record 😉
Didn’t Bing Maps call it “Birds Eye”? Although their satellitte imagry was not directly top down like Google’s. Instead it was a ~45 degree angle between the ground and it’s perpendicular.
wow and there was I a kid wondering how cool was that satellite that could picture my house from that distance. This is the "Santa is not real" for me. just wow. #everybodylies
Done this -- ignore the stupid idea, do the right one -- many, many times even in just design.
Don't bring up the issue and 99% of the time your can just sneak it in. No one remembers, no one checks any decisions.
The Big Question: Who decides what is “stupid” and what is “the right thing to do”?
Does morality play a part in this?
Or just whimsy of the decision-maker?
More than once I've blown off /illegal/ directives from management when they won't listen.
That one seems easy to defend. Ethical isn't far behind. Then embarrassing if publicly revealed, etc.
I've experienced similar things at both Google and Microsoft. We developers know how the code actually works to a scary degree. Usually these things are decided by laziness - shorter descriptions, shorter CLs, etc. It's one useful optimization strategy.
It definitely does continue to mis-educate people. Have to constantly tell people that what they think of as "satellite imagery" has nothing to do with satellites.
You must think you've told a funny story, but every aspect of it makes me cringe. Useless meetings, arbitrary choices, cutting off acquired teams from key decisions, thinking you're worth something when you're just a cog in this machine called turbocapitalism...
Ever thought that Sergey came up with the ridiculous name just so the argument would stop and he was fine with satellite (hence not saying anything about it, or “not noticing” it)
OR was Sergey purposely waiting til the last minute to suggest a really bad idea so that the two divided parties come to an agreement? Sounds like the kind of management technique King Solomon had used (1 Kings 3:23-27)
trying your employees patience and making decisions without being thoughtful enough that your employees ignore them because of its inanity - "kind of fun"
Its interesting @btaylor, u used a Indian actress @AnushkaSharma's GIF motif😊👍
Btw very interesting insight to @googlemaps and also a product development life!
Why dont you write a book??
Considering that as a result tens of thousands of people are now under the completely wrong impression when it comes to the capabilities of satellite imaging, I can’t really say they were wrong.
Sergey once told us to come back [to exec review] once our project was more useful to him than his toothbrush which could dispense toothpaste automatically.
However, as a UI designer at the time with an undergrad in cartography and remote sensing, "Satellite" never bothered me. Anything else woulda been a pain to try explaining to users
Because implying that birds took the photos is so much more honest :-) I guess this was a missed opportunity to be really honest by calling it Surveillance Mode.
It might of sounded silly at the time, but people would have gotten used to it & most likely would have become a catch phrase. For example, people don't think its silly to say "Google it" instead of "Search it"
thank you for sharing. love the story.
another way of differentiating between three key tenants of the existence of a company. who has:
#ownership#possession#control
it matters.
And yet you’ve joined, pushing others also to join, the group of morons that thinks Tomato is a vegetable iso a fruit. If it is not Satellite, Bird View would have been catchy and technically more correct.. sad story actually.
As a relevant corporate group, part of the daily life of almost human being accessing internet daily, you also have a moral duty to educate. Misleading masses does not seem that ‘hilarious’ to us.
12 March 2016,Li Zirui, a six-year-old boy, was killed by Deng Lili of Chenzhou Hospital in Hunan Province, China, in violation of medical taboos. write false medical records so that the child can leave the hospital after his death to continue his treatment.