I was just told apparently it’s weird to have a “dump document” open where you copy and paste the things you’ve decided to cut from your written draft (right now, a motion) *just in case you need it later.* I save it in the file b/c I can’t let go.
Anyone else do this?
I start almost every article with a “notes” document, which serves the same purpose. But when editing I often make a “leftovers” doc in case something that seemed expendable on first read makes more sense later.
Mine is "scrap." And I almost always read back over the "scrap" at the end of the drafting/editing to make sure there's nothing there that should go back in the actual draft.
I do this with video clips as well and name it outtakes. Great content later on. I lip sync music to warm myself up. I put this together from outtakes.
I've never heard of this.
I save edited versions depending on the state of completion. The first writing is version 1-1, updated to 1-2 and so on, and significant changes (ordering of arguments, new supporting evidence, tracked changes from others) move it to 2-1, etc.
I sometimes have a separate file of what I want to say but isn’t on point to the specific facts of the case. I have to write them to get them out of my head to let me focus on the actual case. If they are “really good,” I save them for future cases that may or may not come.
Am I the only one who does this for everything? In our profession, our written and spoken words are our currency. I’m not into just throwing away my hard earned currency.
I use one note to keep all my ideas and then copy to my documents. Then later I can search one note if I want to use something in another document I am drafting.
I call mine “spare parts.” You never know, a reviewer might want to know more or the information can be used in another manuscript. Nothing is truly junk. I guess I’m a thought hoarder!
I am not a lawyer but I write official correspondence on behalf of my employer every day and have exactly this. Sometimes an argument or turn of phase doesn’t fit but might next time.
I even go so far as to start labeling the cuts. “Burning dinner”, “Arguing with Xander ”, “The chase”. 🙄 That’s when I know my brain has wondered too far into organization. Gotta get my ass back into telling the story. 🤣
If or when I no longer care about the topic (rare), no longer have access to critical aspects of the research (although that’s a maybe), or technological advances force me to do so with some lower priority items.
Understatement: I’m not a fan of deleting.
I always ctrl-X ctrl-V my cut text into an email message addressed to myself. When I reach the end of that round of revisions, I hit send on the email. Preserves the cut text with a time stamp. For the next round of revisions, you can just reply to the email.
Yep. My office has started saving these in a general research folder named by topic instead of client. That way everyone benefits from the others' rabbit hole results.
I almost always do that when I am working on a complex motion. How else do people do it? It helps to organize your thoughts and make sure you don't forget relevant cites too.
That's what I call mine too :-) Two docs titled 'Scratch,' one for work and one for myself, in Google Docs & Quip so I can reach them anywhere. Been doing it for at least 20 years, it used to just be a text file.
Not weird! I have an irrational fear that a partner might suggest adding the substance of what I’ve cut. What am I going to do then, rewrite it?! No, it’s safely tucked away. (This has never happened.)
I have that too! Always concerned that I’m going to have to try to research again and not find the case because I found it via a 2am rabbit hole search one time.
I'm just sitting here in awe, wondering what life is like for people who have the audacity to *not* have a dump document? Just... living recklessly, all that confidence. Typing with actual swagger. So ballsy.
That happened to me once in the pre-computer days. Not pretty. “You wrote it just the way I told you to, but now that I see it on paper I think I like the way you wrote it the first time better. Hope you saved your draft.”
True if I’m learning something new I will have different documents for each issue ... i.e., recently it was “Standing,” “APA-Excess of Authority,” etc.
Yes. It’s the organization - presenting it in a logical order that makes sense - that I find the most time consuming (after the research of course - I tend to get sucked into rabbit holes.)
The hardest part is finding the actual issues. When you don’t know the law, you can’t spot the issues. So it just takes a lot of reading and briefing. 75 cases too in our “closed world.” Takes up a lot of time.
I've thought of doing this but what holds me back is that I fear that unless it's well organized and maintained it won't be any use later anyway, and I'm not putting in that kind of work organizing literal refuse.
Sounds like a lot of people keep it pretty organized. I can, depending on the length of the memo, but most of the time I don’t. To anyone else it’s a page of random cases and excerpts, but to me it’s a security blanket.
I often start a research process with a scratch document I use for research notes, and I'll usually save those at until argument. Not everything in there will wind up in the brief and it will usually just be an outline of points with some key case citations, nothing like a draft.
I note where it's from (chapter, or key event) and the date it was removed, and separate each chunk with a space, most recent first. Not otherwise organized, other than specific to the WIP. Pretty simple.
Ha that’s how I feel about a lot of what I save. I think to myself, “this isn’t super relevant but what if I reconsider my argument and it becomes relevant again? Do I want to find this/type this out again?”
Someday someone will inevitably ask me about this topic....
so I email myself interesting research, cites, removed language from briefs, etc.
It HAS happened before.
I do this with every brief. Even if the cut material never makes it back in. (It usually doesn’t.) A purgatory page (my name for it) saves me the agony of killing my darlings all at once.
It's a good thing to do and One other works really well for stuff like this, especially of it's a big project and you have several categories of dumped things and background materials
I have a whole Note on My Yahoo! Notepad titled "Resources" and consisting mostly of things I want to have handy, or links to them, for use in online discussion. For graphics, I have a corresponding folder in my mail account.
I do this with an email draft. I also have a file where I keep Contract language that I like and use all the time. Don’t need to reinvent the wheel everytime.
I generally just save new versions with a new name when I make big changes, putting the new date on what I save. That way I don't lose anything. But the dump document makes sense.
My word program does that for me, luckily, so I guess I have both. When I’m really anxious about it, I email drafts to myself just so I know I can recover it in a meltdown.
Google Doc can be edited offline and automatically backed up when connected to the Internet. It has revision history too. This could help avoid manually emailing drafts to yourself.
// With that said, I have a dump area in my doc too. It's easier than looking though history.
Me too ( email ). But I also save each session as a different version. I once lost a whole chunk of something and am terrified of it happening again .... so - belt and braces .....
I have three documents for every story. One for dump/notes/research, one for the current chapter I'm working on, and one for all of the already finished chapters (so I dont catch myself rereading and editing old chapters when the newest one needs my attention first).
I prefer Dump Docs because then all removed info is sorted in one location and I don't have to hunt it down by scouring through 20 renditions of the same paper.
It do it in part because it makes me feel better about cutting text that I actually need to cut but am hesitant to excise because I put effort into it.
Same here. Fortunately pixels don’t take up physical room, or I’d be in a world of hurt.
My cut-content files are usually called something like “extrastuff.” Not particularly creative but it does the job, ha.
I do this, sometimes in a document and sometimes in an email to myself that I save to the file. I don’t have a fancy name for mine, but I’m tempted to steal @AppellateGuru’s “cutting room floor” title.
The “cutting room floor” file is clutch. I’ve also called it the “bone yard” because it’s where some undeveloped arguments go to rest (but may possibly be resurrected again, such as on reply). IMO having these discard files makes total sense.
Unless, of course, one has a photographic memory. Then I guess it is weird and abnormal. But for the rest of us, the “cutting room floor” file is important.
yes definitely!! and/or every time i sit down to work in whatever it is i “save as” and retitle it with the date, so i end up with no less than like nine versions of it in various stages that Anxiety Brain refuses to let me delete “because i might need it later!”
same or I’ll be like “JohnSmithDepoOutline_Final” “JohnSmithDepoOutline_Final2” “JohnSmithDepoOutline_Final3” “JohnSmithDepoOutline_Final THIS ONE” “JohnSmithDepoOutline_Final SRSLY FINAL DOC”
Oh I was afraid I was the only one without a dedicated file, but instead have
V1
V2
V3-submitted
V3-comments
V3.1, V3.2, V3.3
V4
V5
V6-submitted
ad nauseam.
I'm a professional grantwriter and I'll have a list of the file names like that, but you know it's getting serious when I start doing a timestamp as well, like 953p
I have a line in the document. Everything above the line is edited into readability. Everything below is a snippet that isn't yet or was cut earlier. As I write, the snippets slowly congeal into new edited paragraphs, or stay in purgatory.
This is when I usually just create a new version of the brief for the shortened version (thankfully I’ve always worked places with doc management software so I don’t have to have new file names for all the versions).
I do this before and after. I keep all the quotes from cases I really want to use in one document. Then I moved all the cut sentences over there and keep them all just in case.
That’s what a form library is for, in the transactional world. Start from the standard and conform to fit. Avoids sweeping in past one-off mistakes or concessions
If you work in Latex you can just comment it out.
Most of my documents are 9/10 commented out stuff and when I think about it I start to hate my life..... but at least it's not git!
I’ve always created a “net draft” to house all possible materials, links, quotes, devil’s advocate ramblings, etc. When I’m ready to sculpt/whittle down, I use a *copy of that broad net thrown* that’s a composite of my own research & thought processes. Very useful later. Save it.
I do it and I save it for just about every substantive document I work on. Super helpful, especially for piecing together trends in case law/making use of quotes that pop out but it isn’t instantly obvious where it would fit. Freaks out people in Sharepoint documents
Yes. Sometime I remember a bit of info but not what source I got it from. For that reason, I keep interesting tidbits with sources and links, knowing I can find them later in a search. An advantage of electronic documents.
I just save old drafts. But yeah, you never know when that obscure point will suddenly tie everything together (not). Also, I think this is a habit of people who write slowly--fluid writers know they can just rewrite.
Oh, I absolutely do this. It makes it so much easy to cut things if I know I can access them later should I change my mind. I rarely do, but still. And sometimes a darling or two makes its home in another piece of writing.
Yes! I’m very picky about the order I present information in and the general flow of writing so I tend to move things around a lot. Plus, I feel like I put in WORK writing that content and while it didn’t work in a certain spot, it might come in handy elsewhere!
If you craft text in Google docs, all edits are saved in a version history, which is less frustrating than having to move between documents and remember where cut text was initially. Trust me, I've been there.
I routinely do this. It makes it so much easier to cut.
Once I cut an section X to reach arbitrary word count, put it in dump file, expecting referees to want this for R&R. Referees said, "author should do X," so I did!
Sent to editor, "sorry about word count." MS accepted.
If that helps you mentally to get past deleting it, then do it! There is a saying amongst writers that you need to be prepared to “kill your darlings.” We often get attached to things we write, but also need to be prepared to “kill” them if it makes the work better/more effective
I do this and nobody ever taught me, I just started doing it, perhaps b/c I always tend to overwrite a lot and I am therefore forced to cut huge sections and it doesn't make any sense to completely junk writing that has citations that can represent hours of work.
It’s not weird! It helps me cut things I might otherwise be loath to delete because I know that they’re not gone for good. And I have def used content from the dump document before!
I even save these for word’s full text search later because I’m lazy and I will 100% be pasting those two pages into another brief at some point in the future!
I’ve learned to delete nothing until my writing is complete. Instead I just dump it to the bottom of the document I’m writing. A dump file isn’t a bad idea though.
Yes, mine starts as bits and pieces at the end of the document under the heading “cut(s)”, then, when the writing it ready for the next step (usually review of some kind), it gets moved to a new document called “[original file] cuts”.
OMG I DO THIS!! And I even call it “[name of file I’m working on] dump”! I thought I was the only weirdo who does stuff like this. Clearly, my reluctance to delete anything extends even to word documents.
I invented this sometime circa 2005, when our document-management practices were just a touch above "save to desktop." Proud that it's still a (negative) productivity tool today! #MyNewMotto: Inventing new ways to #entomb wasted words in #carbonite, since 2005.
Yes. But I put them at the end of the first draft under the heading “notes not to be produced” and often end up using them later, either in that project or in others.
I use the dated format a lot of other people have noted but I’ll start creating a dump doc now. I’m finding it difficult to find stuff back in time cos I don’t know in exactly which day/date what I need is in. This way, I know what I need it’s in that one doc.
When I get to the point of cutting something I may want later, I save, the save again, but as new version, then make the big edit... knowing I can go back and find my earlier prose in a prior version. A modern doc mgt system of course makes this easier ...
it's weird not to. Been doing this for ages, although I go back and forth between a separate document and keeping it in the same document at the end after a couple page breaks.
Yes. Why would someone suggest that’s weird. In the before times, we used to write ideas on index cards keep them for later. Cut and paste is literally built on that idea. How is time passing this fast?!
I have never done this in 17 years of practice. I have used track changes, which literally tracks every change, included deleted text (as strike through) and allows you to reinsert deleted text. I’ve also just saved versions of documents (“factumv1” vs “factumv2”)
While this works in some circumstances, you can only grep the current view. You can persuade software engineer tools (such as git) to give you running deltas, but it's a pain.
Dump docs can be easily searched and bulk indexed.
Yes! I do exactly this! Just because something I've written doesn't fit in this particular document, doesn't mean it won't slide in nicely somewhere else 🙂 I've used stuff that I wrote years prior.
I used to "save as" with the date or time so that I could go back to earlier versions, now I use track changes or save as a new version on our document management system.
I use Latex, so I just put a % next to it and it doesn’t show up in the compiled pdf. This is the main reason I use Latex. I couldn’t bear to actually get rid of material; what if I change my mind?!
I do this. I used to put this at the end of the doc but then got paranoid the cuts at the end would end up filed one day (never happened) so now I use a separate doc.
Writing my dissertation for my doctorate and always have a “dump” document. But that’s new to me. Younger me thought every idea and concept I conceived was indispensable. 🤦♀️
I always have that. And I often use that extra text later to get started with a related manuscript. So no, I don't think it's weird at all :) super useful rather
Oh yeah, call mine “discarded scraps.” Keep on for every project, and for longer projects, divide by chapter (though these typically evolve as project does).
Absolutely necessary due to the 180 and 360 degree digressions, and characters dropped and scene cuts, not to mention the extra depth demanded during the editorial process and 897 other changes endured during the seven to twelve years of finishing a book!
I do this with every longish / complex draft. I even have a standard name for the “dump document”. Had no idea that anybody else did it, so your tweet is quite reassuring :-)
I call it the “clipboard” and I have one for each writing project. I usually end up returning to it multiple times to move things around and cut and paste, and sometimes I pull from them for new pieces.
I don't have a "dump document" but I go crazy with version controls. Whenever I think I have an updated version of a document, I save it as a new file and then run redlines against the previous. I keep both "clean" and "redline" copies :P
With written docs and also have similar process for things cut out of timeline in film editing. Don’t find that I frequently go searching for cut material but indispensable tool when needed!
Of course I keep a discard file! So I don’t have to think up good thoughts twice. I’ve always advised writing students & clients to do it too. It helps writers let go of their darlings.
Yes, it's called 'cut bits'. I always have one and encourage PhD students to do this too as it helps you to let go of things that don't belong in the main argument but that you love with all your heart.
Not weird at all. My MA tutus calls it ‘keeping the edits from the cutting room floor’. Makes it easier to cut things out (and put them back if you change your mind) and comes in handy for other writing too.
"cold cuts" (in Finnish though: leikkeleet, which is closer to "filet" tbh) is the name for mine. And darlings (in my head it's closer to "goldies" in Finnish: kultaset)
I do this! I tell my students to do it. The emotional burden of throwing away hard work & relevant research is heavy, and when time is short this is a great hack! Do you ever use it again? I rarely do.
Sometimes a dump document, sometimes previous versions with some info in the file name.
Naming convention is something like:
[document name] - DRAFT [version#] - [optional comment on this version]
When the document is finished, I'll delete most drafts but sometimes keep a few with important sections that were not used and/or clean up (or even create) a new dump doc with clear internal labeling.
I like the idea. I had a discussion graveyard once, at the end of a draft, of all the ideas I had cut from the discussion from previous versions. Useful to get input from co-authors on whether an idea should have been cut or not. And yes, easier to let go that way.
Me! I do it. It makes it easier to cut words you Spent so many hours writing when you can put them on ice rather than bury them for good. And what doesn’t belong in one project might work in another.
I’m just a 2L, but I do this. We are working on our moot court appeal briefs. I have ~ 10 windows open. My “dump” doc, my outline, my drafts, my cases,etc. ... I feel a little better knowing others do it too
Although I use a lot less now - don’t know if I am better (more practised) at writing close to what I want first time or worry less about cutting hard earned words.... prob a bit of both
Yes! It was a tip that @ciara_hackett gave me while doing my PhD and it's the best idea ever. It makes revisions etc so much easier and work is sitting there for shorter media pieces (if I ever get around to that). Also helpful for a book proposal.
My dump file is always called "Bits" and I oftem retrieve stuff from it or use it for other projects. Somehow I accidentally deleted a large section from my last one and lost some vital reference material that I'll never be able to find again. Still bummed out about that.
Do it too, as a PhD student I often reused some parts, even in my final manuscript. I'll keep doing it, it takes away the frustration of deleting. something. for. ever. and allows you to write freely without the urge to do it right the 1st time. Great self brainstorming.
Definitely a good idea! Also, I always save a complete back-up before I start cutting and pasting, in case I cock it up completely. That way I can always start again from square 1.
It seems weird *not* to do that. I do that and have mine saved as "[File name] Removed" for ease of reference. Sometimes I even go back and reuse the text for the same or other documents.
Mine are called “To Reopen” with the date and can cover more than one project.
They also include URLs to material I didn’t use but that might be useful in the future.
How carefully the items are labeled is a good indicator of how stressed and how rushed I am.
Not weird at all. Something i advise all my research students to do. I've quite often come back to these excised sections for related projects where they fit better.
I used to save a new version of the document every time I made major changes. Ended up with a bazillion versions at least ten of which had "final" in the file name.
Absolutely do this. Call it the Parking Lot and it helps me be more ruthless in my cutting knowing I can our ir somewhere until I may need it (hardly ever).
When I write in LaTex and this happens, I tend to just comment out the removed text. That way I can bring back select bits of it if needed. Seems common sense to me.
Of course! I always had a file of things cut from my PhD, things unedited ( in case I preferred the uncut version) and extra things in case I had room.
Yes, of course. There's always a time when content might be useful in something else. Why lose good writing just because it doesn't fit in that one draft?
I dont and then im pissed when I can't remember what the thing i wanted to put back in was exactly and the try to recreate it isnt as good. I should do a dump doc but I know I won't anyways. :(
Many books have been written/edited from “dump” documents, folders & boxes, particularly after an author dies. I have a couple of articles put together from materials that were not a good fit for the original article, but were perfectly fine on their own.
It’s weird not to do this IMO 😂 Makes it much easier to dump stuff that’s not working because you’ve got it somewhere. 95% of the time I don’t go back but occasionally there’s a thread of an idea I’m glad to have!
I’ve got a ton of email drafts that I’ve even titled for this very purpose.
This dumping ground has come in very handy over the years! I’ve been able to pull documents re any number of subjects together very quickly based on the cast-offs from previous ones.
Not only do I do it, I advise my students to do it, too.
It doesn’t matter if you never go back to the bits; it’s about convincing your brain that it’s ok to cut from your paper bc that idea or sentence isn’t disappearing forever; it just doesn’t belong in THIS paper!
Reverse outlining is when you summarize the main point of esch para in the margin to see what you’ve actually said/argued. Really helps w reorganization, also good for cutting redundancy!
Yes! Im grad school, mine was always in the same document at the bottom. When I finished my writing, I would save a final version without the parts I cut.
Not quite. I duplicate my documents each time I do an edit, so that I have a series of comparable edits in their original context.
It’s a tad excessive of me, but 🤷♂️
Of course - I have loads of text files on the go in notepad++ which I use for snippets of thought, drafted paragraphs, a to-do list, things to investigate later on the web, ideas for quiz questions and all sorts of other junk...!
I have a big file of HTML that I've removed from pages I manage but I'm too stupid to easily recreate, which I keep in case I need it again. So sort of.
For you and I, sure. For most people, not really. This is one reason Google Docs is so successful; it increases access to versioning and document "history" for people who otherwise would have none.
Git/job it does, would catalyze humanity. Just imagine impact in academia or law.
I use git but I do also have a scratch file, for those bits that you know fit in somewhere and you might just need to put back. It’s different because it sits open for me to see. Editing is non-linear.
I do this a bunch when I am making presentations, too. Alot of things that are *good* ideas for a slide, but just don't fit exactly what I am trying to do. Will get 75% done, realize that this isn't the right frame for the audience. Save the slide, dump it to a WiP
I do to but never gave my process a name. "Dump document" - Love it.
I also do it while drafting email msgs. The "dump" email msg's subject line becomes "Next xxxxx"
I have multiple directories called «attic», very rarely do I ever use things that are put in there, but it’s good to know that it’s not completely gone :-)
Me: Let's compromise. We'll put it in the "Extra Writing" document, then we'll come back and reevaluate later.
My perfectionism: Okay. But promise we'll actually do that.
Me: I swear it.
(I have never ever added something back into final writing from the Extra Writing doc. 🤫)
Unless accounting spreadsheet practice has moved on, I used to do it clearing reconciled items from from accounts reconciliations. Provides an audit trail of what amounts were ticked off to what. Good practice.
I find it really useful -a sort of bank of ideas.
And some of those files are coming up to their 21st year. Mind you, I only recently got rid of the peat samples from my PhD - finished in 2003 and moved 4 times across the UK🙃
I call it the slushpile. I have one for the book I have written. The one I use currently is for a book ms. For shorter documents, I mostly rely on Docs versioning to go back to previous deletions.
You can use the track change option in MS Word for this. Turn it on and view set to "No changes". If you change your mind later, switch view to "view all tracked changes" then "reject deletion".
Yes, I do this. When I code, I mostly use WebStorm and PyCharm. These have a built-in scratch folder where I can keep snippets of code I write that I may only use later on. So, no, it's not weird. Even us programmers do it! 😀
I used to do this, but there are clipboard caching tools that make this so much faster and easier now.
I couldn't live on Windows withing CLCL (nakka.com/soft/clcl/inde…), havent found one I like on Linux yet but there's a few options: tecmint.com/best-clipboard…
I save all drafts just in case I said something better or had an idea I had to put on hold, but I have never actually gone back to these early drafts! So perhaps I need this “dump document”!!!
Totally. There’s a whole cottage industry of clipboard managers that’s been built around this. A plaintext file is just the archetype. And often all one needs.
Yes. I keep a dump document for copied text that I want to use later. I find it very useful for large documents. It saves me from scrolling a lot or trying to remember what page to fill in for Cont+G
Yes. Totally. I call it The Leftovers and much like food leftovers, sometimes they sit in the fridge, never to be consumed. And sometimes you dig into them again.
I do that too, BUT if you use something like Google Docs where there is built-in document versioning... the history of all past edits remains available still. So it can make it easier to clean up a document knowing you can go back if needed.
Hoards of cuts. Think of how brutal it would be to just throw them away. And if you save them, then the document you cut them out of gets a lot tighter and smoother, because you do not try to fit all that extraneous treasure (i.e., distractions) into it.
I absolutely do this, but only for major pieces of writing.
I do a lot of research-oriented writing, so I always want to save those golden data discoveries even if they don’t fit the topic or tone of the current piece.
I'm starting writing an new article right now and I just created my dump file. Experience has taught me too many times that if I cut something out, I later realize it should fit my argument, and I can spends hours searching for the relevant quote again...
I have one (or more) for each book I write.
Some are well over half the word count of the book.
I’ve never deleted any of those files.
Don’t think I ever will.
😎
Psst in which case if you ever delete, you are bound to need it the next day. At least that’s what happened when I quietly ‘lost’ some of the 25+ years of accumulated ‘just in case’ DIY bits & pieces...
Is this shame because you do not have a file of sentences you are storing for future use/just in case?
If so, it’s never too late. You can start now. You will never regret it. 🤣
Makes little difference but for every paper or book I’ve written there’s a ‘stuff’ folder - the discarded text & papers for it. Just ensure comments on old text don’t get into final docs.
I do this for fiction, because my characters keep getting minds of their own and refusing to go where I want them to. Might as well save the half-written scenes and hope they'll obey me eventually. Never thought of doing it for academic stuff though...
I do this 100% of the time when I’m writing or editing. AND I have re-used some of that cut out content in other works later, completely justifying the practice. It also makes it less daunting to cut out entire sections when needed.
I do it constantly - I have multiple versions of the same document, and I recommend all my students do the same. It helps, psychologically, to get you past the block of knowing a section is good but still needs to be cut. You tell yourself that you'll use it some other time!
I call it "dead angels," after the advice I received years ago never to "kill your angels" (stuff you've written that you like but which doesn't fit the draft).
This would be my 'compost pile' where ideas might deconstruct to it's simplest concepts and nourish another idea in different conditions.
My best professional yields come from the compost.
Any other #gardeners out there?
I am happy to report that I moved recently and I made it an absolute law, not to have a junk drawer. It once cost me a warrant for my arrest, and a $650 fine, for a fix it ticket that I decided to fight, but failed to show up because the ticket got lost in the junk drawer 🤦🏻♀️😫
Sounds like that should be a built-in feature: "Cut and Save." But I do the same sort of thing: when in doubt, I start a new version of the doc. My drive is littered with files like "Chapt 04.2a"
Mine is called "junkyard" when I'm deep in editing/slicing/dicing mode. I'm great with a quick paragraph, but not always certain the moment I write it where it really belongs, so there's a lot of moving around. Keeping a document like this is a win.
You are not alone. The post it app on osx is like a storage for thoughts. I have an idea, put it in ”storage” to be able to think about other things. Perhaps it’s more copy/paste for thoughts..? Well, something like that. :)
Totally normal. Have them all over my codebases for the same reason. Although I take flak for trying to check them into repositories by people who can apparently remember git hashes of their changes without any cognitive pain...
I have a “cuts” file for every paper I write. Sometimes when they get too full I have more than one. Definitely helps with cutting prose and sometimes I do retrieve entire paragraphs.
I almost never retrieve writing but it is the only way to cope with the need to cut. I teach students to do this too. For almost every piece of writing I have a “cut from _____” document
I’ve never thought of doing this before, but this is brilliant. I usually just keep stuff I cut at the bottom of a doc, but that does mess up the word count and eventually I have to delete it. Your system is much better.
I have these, and I have used some of them as fodder for other publications. But mostly it makes killing a loved passage doable. "It's not dead, it will live on forever in my hard drive backup."
I do this, and not just to placehold cut stuff. If I'm stuck on wording or trying to reorganize, I use the 'dump document' as a sort of clean space to do that. When I like it again, I move it back to the draft.
The lawyers I work for re-save every draft change as “v.1, v.2” etc. so what they originally wrote is still available to copy and paste back in if they change their minds later.
Yes! It makes it so much easier to edit knowing that what you’re cutting isn’t really “gone”, a.k.a all that hard work wasn’t for nothing. I also end up pulling from it for other projects.
Yes! I do it to free myself in the editing process. It gives me power to cut to the bone without anxiety. I rarely consult the file of cut writing, but knowing I could gives me peace.
I do this, and recommend it to all of my students. In most cases, I never reuse the disposed fragments, but it helps developing a more coherent piece of work by reducing the mental pain of deleting text and ideas.
Yes. I have an entire “dump journal” organized by date with key words in bold, and I also write the tiniest comment to myself as to why I didn’t just delete it.
I did this throughout university. Only deleted once I submitted final documents. It’s actually so much less stressful to have all the bits there in case you revise and want to pull something back in.
This is a "best practice" and anything other than "weird".
Txt files are small and easily searchable for later reference.
I use Notepad ++, as I do this for both written documents and program scripts.
Cleanse, what you need to hold is programmed into you, unless it's research or evidence that comes under the ethos historical documentation dump it, I used to be like this but realised because my knowledge continually expanded looking at old data was like reading child's books🌸
I always have what I term an 'off-cuts' document. The bits I edit out tend to be those I've spent inordinate amounts working on and they often come in useful for future pieces.
I move cut sections to the top of the document that I am working on and only when I think that I am finished with the document, do I delete the stuff at the top. I may start moving the stuff to a dedicated "dump document" instead of deleting from now.
I put it all in the same document beneath the -30- that marks the end of my actual text while I’m working, then save as a different file before I delete it (so I still have it just in case).
It's a good idea and I've literally just done it! You might want to expand the material you've cut from, turning article into chapter, or create a new article on a related topic using material that didn't quite fit. Or you might decide to restore it as it works better
I use sublime text as my notebook instead of those note taking apps. Save my changes on Google drive so they are synced. I end up using them all the time.
It's much more efficient to use a version control system. There are online and offline options, less or more easy to use. Even MS Office has a built-in VCS in its newest releases.
Sure, there are many solutions. But with a VCS you have all old and new pieces of text stored automatically in a timeline. You can even give informative names to key versions, so it's easy to find specific pieces. Then, you can copy and paste them between versions very easily.
It’s not weird. It’s the sign of a writer apparently - similar discussion in Facebook last week.
Now I’ve submitted my thesis I probably ought to delete the dump files though 😂
twitter.com/Esperranzaaaaa…. sorry if I'm disturbing you rn 😭 But if I'm not , can I ask a favor? can you please Boost my pinned tweet and if u are able to help me 🙏Please spare me some help even $1 goes a long way 😢 I'm begging to you please help me in this hardship 🙏😭
( I can no longer really face it alone.😭 )
My name is Esperanza Amor segismundo, I live in a trailer in union country. I've have a severely bad back, knees and COPD, I am also on disability.Both of which need upcoming surgery,
These are my purgatory documents! I also don’t get rid of them . And there have been times that I passed the text on to others or used it for other things!
Just do one back up of your entire original notes file. You need to have a record of where you have been and where things came from, and also later something you thought was not needed might be.
If I don't type in an editor where I can comment/hide lines, I usually keep all this dump at the end of the document. When I'm done I erase it, and usually I realize 2 days after that I needed something.
Yep. I do this. I call it Outtakes. I often take bits from it to put back in the main draft or into new books. It's a good idea so you don't lose anything you've written.
Oh yeah! 😂 In the last year or so I’ve finally started actually utilizing the “Reading List” feature on my Apple devices, and that space has just become a hoard for my future self to sort through for the diss 😅
I have a 'spare text' document which I copy & paste unwanted words, in case I need them later. I save this in folder with actual written document I'm writing.
I always do this. Why would you not? 🤔 Unless it is a super early draft, those words and thoughts are honed and polished and tightly written and might yet be useful elsewhere, surely?
No, it's a must. I do some copy writing and I keep copies. Fancy having to recompose stuff you change your mind about or worse still delete by accident.
Kinda. I use Git for pretty much everything these days so I either comment stuff out (I use markdown) or just cut it secure in the knowledge that I can go back and retrieve it from my version control system if I need to.
I do this too! And am now happy to know that there are many like-minded folk. Also, a dump document is a far better name for it that '[title] reject' which has been my default name for these things!
I do the same. Sometimes, I remove perfectly written sentences because they don't fit.
Writing is also about removing unnecessary lines. It
s not so weird!
Every paper and grant I’ve ever written has a dump document. I call it my “SFD stuff to keep” (“SFD” is borrowed from @BreneBrown - shitty first draft)
Yes, especially with phrases when writing music. Ideas that help shape the track but ultimately hinder it get dumped to a mute channel in case there's interesting things in there that I might want to reincorporate later.
Uh, yes, emphatically. How else do people keep track of the stray thoughts that don't quite fit, but are still worthy of consideration, that later grow up to be their own articles?
Have done this for years and advise all my students to do the same. Sometimes these edits even find their way into a different paper, but regardless it makes editing so much easier
I absolutely do this! I’m not wasting time rewriting something I’ve already written. Ultimately I might not need it in this document but it could be relevant elsewhere. So provided there no sensitive info I’ll save it.
Yeah I’ve gotten into the habit of keeping versions. Especially for job applications. Having that version with long examples to dip into has been so useful 👏👏
Did it for every chapter of my dissertation. The dump files were all longer than the final chapters. And there were a few times when some material from those dump files migrated back into the chapters.
I just save any version that edits previous work. Bytes are cheap. I can do archaeology if I need something later. So, when working in book021.doc, I may need to find something in book006.doc
Yes! I have a 20 page doc full of bits I like from the drafts of poems I’m writing that they don’t fit anymore and I trawl through the .doc when I need inspiration
Every story I’ve written has a “Deleted from” document that goes with it. Usually I just keep adding to it through drafts but I’ve pulled from it occasionally.
I do! Little nuggets that I can’t say goodbye to go on a new doc, sometimes I weave them back in. I think I find it emotionally hard to delete my work 😂
I do the almost the same! Always feel like a reference/sentence will fit somewhere later on. Instead of the dump document I have a "master" document and then a trimmed down one
I don’t but what a brilliant idea! I sometimes have a hard time editing-it’s difficult to let go of something you feel is written rwell but may not be 100% necessary for that particular document. Have this sort of file would make me a better editor I think! #StealingIt
I usually put my notes at the bottom of whatever I'm working on...and keep it saved as a draft googledoc...then when final save it as a final doc. That way...draft doc has all notes etc
introduces me to “graveyard text” where you put things you have written that we’re good points, but may not help the argument if the current paper you are writing
That's why I liked working with latex, because you can just toggle * the text you don't need on or off. Back in Word, I have a section after the references that is called 'old' where I dump the texts I might need later.
Not sure if it’s still going but @air_story is perfect for you. I do this too. Nothing more frustrating than not being able to remember ‘the line’ when it becomes relevant again. (Like Paul in Mad Men if you remember that scene!)
I think I must be the only writer on earth who finds cutting all too easy. Every time I read my stuff back there's more I want to get rid of. Have trouble making word counts because of it!!
And now that I've realised I am familiar with some of your work (sorry, name recognition is NOT one of my skills), I am always going to think we are the Fellowship of the Slush when I see any again, lol! 😂
When it comes yo that I just save it as a new version and edit/remove contents. Then if I need the old content I just load the old version. Lost count on how many versions I have 🙃
Absolutely. Graveyard, parking lot, lots of names for it. I also give myself word cut goals—if I add 3k but words to that doc, I’ve achieved it, etc. And often, paragraphs move back into my text later.
All the time. It means you have access to stuff you deleted, and it’s great fodder for future work. That page you delete from article a is the seed of article b.
Never heard of an academic who doesn’t have one. If it’s a short bit within a chapter I also paste it to the end of the section so I can slide it back in more easily.
I'm just reading your bio. I definitely did this when I was writing briefs; I had to reuse things or rescue stuff I'd cut all the time. I only had to recreate something from scratch one time before I started keeping a Scratch Paper document.
It's weird *not* to have one of those files. That was the first piece of writing advice I got when I started my PhD. I still use the same system for ongoing projects.
I totally do that and also always have/had cheapo little bound notebooks for scribbling notes on. Think it's a little surprising that nothing app, e-notepad, yada yada across all devices etc has ever been able to replace a little physical notebook for me.
A dump folder and a dump document, version number all my saves. Just in case. Learnt the hard way when my supervisor corrected his corrections in my thesis and went back to something almost identical to original. It's perfectly normal.
I do it all the time. There have been many cases where I have decided to put back paragraphs or sentences I have cut. Or, they may be useful for another piece.
I used to that when I was an academic. Eventually I started to wonder if it was better than not cutting til a draft was done just saving all the old versions. Both seem not weird.
100% my process for all of my academic writing. I do the same thing with quotes (and citations) by topic so I can easily pull references and build on past ideas.
Definitely normal. You need to see ideas through before you know if it worked. So you have to revert to it. I have a dump folder full of that stuff that’s good, but not necessarily the most applicable to the piece I’m working.
Wait I thought everyone who writes for a living does this???
It’s not weird at all. After all you might need it later... (this mentality may be why I have a bunch of stuff in my house I don’t actually need anymore... 🤔)
There is a plug in for my favourite text editor (Emacs) called palimpsest which allows you to either move selected text to the end of the file or to a file with the same name with trash appended so you can find the text and resurrect it required...
Yup! If only I had the discipline to treat my files like my attic and clean them out once a year, so they don't become the digital equivalent of a Hoarders case.
it's a real effective tool too cause if you ever decide that you do in fact want to bring back a certain phrase, whether it's to add onto one that already exists or change it completely, it's still there! true recycling lmao
I've been working with her for a year or so now. Not only is she much smarter than me, she is also much nicer and much more organized. I can't seem to do anything to remedy any of these relative shortcomings, despite some abortive efforts...
I do it in a slightly different way I start a new file with an updated number ie; 'title-3', but keep the old one.
And as I usually write the first draft in A5 sized notebooks meant for school kids, I keep those as well.
I never throw away my work if I can help it.
I do it. Absolutely. I was self employed before the PhD. When you’ve lost a day’s money because you deleted something you didn’t think you needed, your attitude really changes
I don’t have a different document but basically send all of the potential cuts to the end of a section, so that I can look at it later and actually delete later if needed
I call it “cut stuff,” and I find it essential in editing. It lets me hold on to the conceit that every section, every word, is an absolutely necessary pinnacle of well-crafter reason until later when I can finally admit it made no sense or I did not need it after all.
I don't know why that would be considered weird, I do the same with DnD ideas. If something doesn't end up fitting into the story of the adventure it is put to one side for another time.
I put it at the end of my working doc, not in a separate one, and same. I also save drafts by date so I can go back and grab something from a previous draft if I deleted it in haste
People don’t do this? I don’t open a separate doc I just move it all to the end which is a wasteland of bits of ideas, research, and cut bits for anything important I write.
I do the same thing with code that I either cut out of existing files or that I decide to implement a different way. Especially if it's something complex.
I always have a word doc minimised on my laptop with random thoughts, stuff I realise in the middle of the night ( I dream whole sections of reports ) and yeh the ‘dumped but might still use’ bits.
The reject doc is larger than the doc of works in progress, that's for sure. Can be good stripping it for good lines without a home. And when I write features, and have to cut to word length, there's overmatter I'll keep to one side
Always and forever. Aside from my OS and web browser, my plain text editor is the only program constantly running on my computer so that I can move text around from Word, PowerPoint, email, etc. Nearly 100 text files open and I cringe with every single reboot.
Sounds perfect. Other thing my mentor taught me is that for every interesting publication read make one slide for it to summarize it. Not necessarily to use for presentations but so you have the information at hand.
What monster told you this?! Half the time there is a whole second project (a "shadow project") in the bits you didn't include in the first one. I like to call my shadow docs "Being Extras"
Everything I write generates a dump file! I have been labelling these files "trash" for almost 20 years now. As you say, just in case. It makes me feel better about editing stuff out I have unreasonably grown attached to.
I just save versions of what I've written. No dumps but no permanent loss either. I figure I can re-use things for other purposes - especially sources and footnotes. Though whether I've done it more than once or twice?
I am not a writer, but when drafting documents, I have a scratch file that I use to put thoughts down and want to keep them while I flesh out details.
So, no. This is not a foreign concept.
Whoever said it was weird is weird. Most companies I work with usually have a section in their docs called the "graveyard" to hold cut content in case they decide to reincorporate it
My way around this is to add rather than cutting. That is, I write long messy drafts, and then when I know what I am doing, I write a very short version which I expand. This way I am mostly adding and not removing, and I still have the old long messy drafts.
When I'm working on something I typically keep an Out-takes (a term from film-making) section at the end of the document. I copy the final draft to another file. Occasionally I'll make use of the out-takes.
Why not keep this stuff around? Digital storage is cheap.
Yep. All the time. If ‘xx’ is the title of the work, ‘xx needless waffle’ is usually the name of the dump file. I can’t bear to delete it. Like you say, just in case.
I'm even more obsessive. Every time I make a change I save as a new document with a different date or code so I can always get back to anything I've written. And everything autosaved to Dropbox, as well as manually saved to separate hard drive.
Agreed, unless you use text editors and syntax coloring that aids in visual focus. Like all else with writing, it clearly comes down to personal aesthetic preferences.
In the days of real cut and paste, I'd save a good photocopy of docs sent to Boss. Much would be changed,.. on second iteration, I'd have the 'right' words to insert and they would normally get thro' with no question. 40 yrs later try to give date and version no. to older drafts.
I dont because I save things sequentially, so I can always go back to an early version to retrieve it. But I know heaps of ppl who do exactly this. Not weird at all!
Me! Always! You never know what will become relevant later. I never permanently delete anything & may even save the dump document along with the final piece.
Yep! I called the file Graveyard Words. I had to do a lot of reorganization of my writing and stuff that didn't fit in one place often fit somewhere else, or had to be cut entirely.
One of the benefits of LaTeX is that you can use the comment feature to preserve text in the source file without including it in the rendered document. This helps keep things a bit organized, because graveyard files can get unwieldy.
Absolutely yes. Sometimes there’s a real jewel I want to include somewhere, but it just doesn’t fit in that section, so I store it away for later. Would forget more than half of these if they weren’t written down somewhere (ADHD writer).
Absolutely. I have so many Notes and files called “Scraps from [document name].” In consulting, working in slides, we would move cut slides to a section at the end called the “Graveyard” - still do this.
Definitely makes it easier to cut fearlessly.
I don’t think it’s weird, but didn’t know it was so common, either! My dump doc is uniquely named “cut.” It definitely helps me cut ✂️ with abandon (kind of, my boss would snort if she were to read this). 😂
In both academic and creative writing, it I cut something out of a draft, I make sure it is saved elsewhere. I often reuse chunks of things I've cut elsewhere.
Always - it might be a show review, a job application, a marriage proposal - I always save my mistakes instead they have to become the '1st choice' at a later date .....
Yeah, usually cut them to bottom of what I’m writing. I call them Mogwai. As in, not yet gremlins, but definitely need care not to feed them after midnight.
Completely standard practice in software engineering.
We have tools like Sublime (think sophisticated notepad) where you can have as many tabs of different texts and these don't get deleted even if you close the tool/restart computer, no need to save files for "scratch space".
Not weird, I do something diff with the same principle.
I save multiple drafts based on date. If I cut stuff I label it "shortened" so I can always go back to the original if needed.
Unfortunately I mistakenly sent just such a dump doc to colleagues a couple of days ago. Swift apologies followed .... as soon as one responded with questions. Just grateful someone had bothered to read it to be honest!
Correct—I do that all the time. So do my favorite writers. Keep a "dump" document, a "notes to insert later document"—all ways of organizing the physical or virtual space of writing.
I can’t imagine writing any other way. Whoever told you it is weird - I question their writing skills, especially in terms of synthesizing and reorganizing information.
I call it my “meta” document (for “metacognition”). I have meta docs for nearly every major paper I’ve written. My dissertation lit review process consisted of several topic-based meta docs.
Always. Sometimes great language needs to be cut for various reasons, but that's not a good reason to allow a beautifully constructed sentence to disappear into the ether.
Yes! Learned it from a mentor. Except he originally put it at the bottom of the working doc and called it “compost”. I do the same, and when the doc is finished, I cut/paste the leftover stuff into a new doc for later. Definitely saves time. Thanks @drerichsu for that tip! 😊
Yes it’s perfect . I call it a cut file. I often go in and one time I found a whole story in there unrelated to what I was currently writing. SAVE everything except gibberish ! 😅
This is the first rule of writing: “No writing is wasted.” Just because it doesn’t fit what you’re currently working on doesn’t mean it can’t be useful/perfect someplace else... 🤷🏽♀️
I had a piece I wrote as a teenager where I really liked the characters, but the story itself was just not working. Turns out they worked great as side characters in the script I’m working on right now
That's not weird at all. If you like a scene that doesn't work in your current novel, it might work in a sequel or in another work. That's like throwing away your brown belt because it doesn't work with your current outfit.
I'll back this up too. We just went through four revisions on a collaborative case study. I handed off my copy, (1st draft), a week ago for others to work on so I could pivot. Yesterday I picked it back up, made a new copy, added my tweaks & saved off things for an alternative.
I write everything official in LaTeX, so I just comment out sentences if I decide not to ise them, but can still see them when I’m reading the raw tex.
for any others who do this before uploading to arxiv, make sure to delete the comments because the tex files are downloadable! I like using this feature to hide secret messages :)
Oh yes. Learned the hard way - cutting something that I wanted to restore and realising that that what I wrote the first time was better than the rewrite from memory. I call it my overmatter folder
For every paper I’m working on, I create a 2nd document with the same title + “removed parts”. I’ve only ever gone back to these documents once or twice, but it’s comforting insurance for my brain (and I feel gives respect to the work I put into the parts that got cut).
Similar. Retired now. CAD graphic design and structural drawings: every time I made a change I saved the previous files #’d so if the client wanted to go back after seeing changes, I had them. Called it “InProgress”.
I just use track changes and have several versions. The end result is the same right?
I do stash passages at the end or beginning of the doc in the drafting phase though.
Of course! What is weird about that? Esp because I always write 30 pages for a journal that will only accept 20 — those excess 10 pages could turn into another paper.
One of my college professors called it “purgatory” and that name has stuck for me! I also tend to keep the things I cut in the comments right beside where it used to be until I decide that the new stuff is definitely better.
It's not weird at all. I favor track changes and also use 'comment' as in doc repositories because sometimes the first thought is the best thought and I've deleted things in my youth and regretted it later ;)
Similar.. I colour code snippets of draft and move them to the bottom of the page until I’m satisfied with what I have. Probably not the recommended practice though...
I have both “working” and “cut material” documents (former for stuff I’m not sure about, latter for the same as your “dump” document)
Also like - I typed those words!! I worked hard for them! I’m going to save them (AND potentially they can be used for something else)
Not weird, it's genius and using a similar approach has saved my ass several times. For example, I cut some lit review we didn't think we'd need, then a reviewer asks us to discuss the same lit. Without a dump documents or draft hoarding, I'd have to start over.
Definitely not weird and definitely genius. Sounds like person is not used to maximizing the technology. Bits are in abundance and expendable unlike paper and ink, so why not! Probably everyone else has said this already in this thread but here’s my butter to the bread..er thread
Two of the nice things about collaborating on papers in a Google Doc is (1) we just throw any major text we cut into the bottom of that particular document into its own little personal dump and (2) we can always look at prior versions that GDocs autosaves if we forget to do that!
<<the things you’ve decided to cut from your written draft>> I do, too. Who's to say you won't use them later or in another format? I keep a dump doc of ideas, tweets I want to re-use, and query letter paragraphs. Saves a lot of time and typing.
I absolutely do this. Did it on my book. And also do it on my screenplays. Amazing how many times I've had to go back and put back in some of that material.
It's my 99 file. Numbered so that it's the last file in the documents, which are numbered 01 chapter, 02 chapter, etc.
If it's your process, it's not weird or strange, ever. It's necessary.
Also, later you can realize you were insecure and full of too much caffeine and hadn't slept more than six hours over the last two days and of course you need to put that back in. I've been told by others.
I have a scratch pad excel doc that I put all sorts in while I'm working. I only delete stuff in it when I know I won't ever need it. When I used to write essays I'm sure I had a dump doc as well but I've always called it a scratch pad
I’ve added this system-wide on macOS.
In any app i can select text and hit a keyboard shortcut to save it to a text file in my archive directory.
(It makes it really easy to delete code rather than comment it out for all the developers out there.)
I’m not an author and I do this. Whether it’s for a report or an analysis or just an email, I dump stuff in to a word document all day long as I work on projects and refine my work before i send it to clients.
I’m a paralegal and I do this. I’ve never known anyone else who did, but I’ve also never asked, so I imagine it’s more common than not. It shouldn’t be weird. It’s a clever thing to do.
I do this, but it's contained within my "first draft." At the end of the document there will be piles and piles of scraps left over. My "second draft," saved as a new file, is literally nothing but deleting all of that so I can work with the main text.
I started doing it that way, but found I didn’t like all the scrolling back and forth. I just open a file called “scraps” I can access in another window. Saves much time.
Yes! This is how I manage them. Sometimes I have to go fetch a paragraph from “draft7” to add it to “draft12,” but that’s better than losing something I spend an hour writing.
I just cut stuff and save the amended draft as version 2.
V1 still exists if I need to go back and get the stuff I cut.
I’m usually done somewhere between v5 and v10.
Feel like I do it less than I once did in uni, but definitely have a habit like this - either pasting cut bits way down at the bottom of the document, or saving a completely new version file even if I haven't sent to anyone else
The danger with saving the edited out bits at the bottom is the slight but significant risk you may forget to delete them before submission, esp if you're pressed to meet a deadline.
Swear I did exactly this with an essay once through my uni's automated submission system, but luckily realised in time and got away with replacing it with the clean one
Jay Dixit says in his video "Emacs for writers" that he has even written a small extension for his editor to do it with a keyboard shortcut...
Not a separate document though, just a "sandbox" chapter in the same file.
I do a lot of programming and I often cut/paste snippets of code and save them just in case. I don't think it's weird at all.
However, I have been told more than once that I am weird in general, so ... 🤔
Oh absolutely. I also don’t like the message it gives to completely erase material. It might not be keeper material, it might not be for this draft, but it is important and part of the process and should be kept for the fertilizer it was and what it might become.
Same! One for every project. I've been able to pull from the "extra" doc when a reviewer asked for something we'd written but then cut. You never know how helpful it'll be later!
Haha, I do this too! Sometimes I end up just needing a sentence or two from a cut passage or rewrite it to better fit somewhere else. Other times it’s good as is. Not weird at all!
I have to say after writing for so many years...I have never done this. I write drafts for each chapter and make notes for sentences and scenes...but not this.
I do this when film editing – collect bits of scenes and whole scenes at the end of the edit, and regularly refer back and sift through them
I had to sack an editor once who refused to do it working with me bc I find it vital
I do it. I've heard Barry Longyear (SF writer) say he does it. He literally calls it, "The Dump." He says he rarely or never goes back and retrieves anything from it, though.
I think it's probably common.
I use LaTeX and I just comment things out rather than cutting them; the manuscript looks twice as long in the file as it does in the final PDF. I’m basically carrying the dump document along with the paper...
Do you ever browse the TeX sources on arxiv? I don't know if they still give access, but it was interesting to read what authors commented out of their manuscripts.
100%. This is how I write. A constantly updating page of snippets or paragraphs (that might be leftover from another draft/document/story or be freshly written), from which the backbone of a new piece of work is selected. Why discard usable material? Why fret over blank pages? 🙂
I have a ".trash" file in every directory, where I dump snippets of text that I'm not 100% sure I want to get rid of. This removes a lot of pressure from making heavy-handed revisions.
Version control (git) helps too, but it requires much more *commitment* to everything I save.
I always have one. Sometimes I’ve gone back and used whole sections I cut in different pieces. I once started writing a new paper that was half done once I went through prev “excised from...” files from related but diff projects.
I do this! I have a scrap paper document that has loads of random brain dumps and sections of writing i didn’t end up using in it (and even some diagrams).
I call mine the "Clippings Collection." It's there if a piece is there I do want/need later, and it's great to skim through if I'm stuck on a new project.
Even if you rarely, if ever, end up using the stuff.
Thing is, writing is thinking, as inefficient as that is. My readers don't need or want to share the whole messy process.
I do this for every paper I write. If I remove paragraphs or sentences from the paper I’m writing, they are pasted into a document titled, “Discarded”, just in case.
Of course ! Not all the time, only when I migth need it. Sometimes I just keep earlier draft versions, other times I do exactly as you did
Writing is fluid.
Dump *document*? We have a dump *repository*, that holds removed text and partial proposals we’ve written. It’s often the source of a creative spark for a future proposal - “hey, remember that thing we wrote about using faulty plans to identify counter-plans?” (Yes, that’s meta.)
Yes. I also have a “dump slides” PPT for slides I spend time making and decide not to include. I frequently pull sides out of this document and plug them into other decks.
Of course! I use LaTeX and keep the old material in the same file, commented out. One such block ended up as the basis for an entire paper later. Why throw away ideas?
Sounds better than my habit of just pasting it down at the bottom of the document under a line of dashes. Did this for my dissertation as well as fiction.
What’s strange is that word processors / editors haven’t institutionalized this so it’s a feature. I put them at the end of the master document, any editor should automatically create a sidecar document and an alt cut command that puts things there.
Always. At the very least I copy it before I start editing. Or have three docs, "original," "working," and "final." But you don't permanently delete writing.
I read somewhere before that David Foster Wallace had like 500 pages removed from Infinite Jest by his editor (still a 1100 page novel, not including foot notes) and he had to force himself to erase it all because he kept fixating on it and sneaking it back in here and there.
It's not only abt having a clipboard of phrases. It is also about idea development and restructuring your text so your main point will really shine
Sometimes, that means to cut a good point that is slightly sidetracked from your main idea. Save it for later!
I move them temporarily to the end but for large documents this makes perfect sense. Also saving old versions under a different name, just incase you seriously have to backtrack
Always. You may very well wind up returning that to the original document, or even using it in another one later. Editing doesn’t mean throwing things away!
🙋🏾♀️ Sometimes, when revising after ‘the cut’ 👉🏾the writing 🎡 where including it ‘suddenly’ makes👌🏾 sense. Although, my “dump document” usually ends up suspiciously resembling a stack of Post-It 📝!🤷🏾♀️😉
Oh yes. I find them super helpful. It also helps me cut things that I love but that aren’t working from papers or stories. I’m not “killing my darlings,” I’m just moving them to a new home.
Yes. They’re usually well written or interesting bits that don’t quite fit. They almost never get put back in. I eventually treat them as background to the story.
I do it with historical research - I keep every newspaper article, map, government bulletin, even though I know that I can't use them. When it's bio research I often fall in love & can't let go of any details of their lives (it's a problem lol).
Yes and think it’s great practice overall. It allows you to write more freely and edit thoughts from there.
Esp important for decks - the edited part typically goes in the verbal narrative and the condensed point stays on the slides.
I draft and make notes in a fab app called @MilaNote which automatically saves my drafts etc. Then copy and paste into a word doc from there. Nothing lost!
I always do that. It’s also sometimes easier to format a case quotation in the dump document and then paste it into the brief. I dump cites in there before I decide which ones to use in the main doc.
Anytime I'm doing more than minor copyedits, I save under a new revision number and file away the previous draft in case I want to go back and grab stuff out of it.
I do have that, especially if I'm having a big cull, because some parts might actually show up again in a different chapter etc I call it my Graveyard Document
I do this.
First, I put all of this at the end of the rolling draft document.
Then, I move them to a separate file. Often, there are great passages, analyses, or referenced material but it just doesn't quite fit with the rolling draft.
When I open a part finished doc to continue editing/adding content I rename it to that data date and so the previous version is always available to steal from
I call it cut_txt and have it for everything I write. Sometimes it's useful for longer pieces or series of pieces where material may reappear. Sometimes, it's just encouraging to review, because I see that a final version did make progress over what I was originally drafting.
It is absolutely NOT weird. My dump files are labeled as “[doc]scraps,” leading to some interesting file names considering what I’ve been working on lately. Sometimes I use them for later writing, but sometimes it’s just helpful not to through out sentences I become attached to.
Of course we do. Do you know the line about editing: “kill your darlings? “Well this is a little more like putting them in an independent living facility to play canasta and hang out with their friends.
I advise authors to do this! ("OK, so it didn't fit in the chapter, but you can repurpose it when you need to write some blog posts promoting the book.")
Ha! I’m not even a writer (I tried to write something once) and I have a document where I pasted all the stuff I loved and cut cause I couldn’t bare to part with it 😂
Yes. It's called my 'odds and sods' file.
Sometime you just can't let go of a sentence or phrase. So you tuck it up, nice and cosy, with the other misfits.
I once read an interview with Alexander Chee where he said that he did this for one of his novels and at one point realized, once it got to a certain size, that the dump document WAS the novel.
I call it "scraps" and they have come in useful, esp. when there are multiple drafts. Sometimes they just need to simmer down to something more essential.
I absolutely do this! I call it the Cutting Room Floor and I save absolutely everything. It allows me to cut without over-thinking, and get it back if I need it elsewhere later. Stuff I don't use can become the launching pad for an article or social media post...or another book!
When I write I nearly always have a dump document. Otherwise, some things you've written become unrecoverable of you cut them from your manuscript but later change your mind. I only rarely actually use anything in the dump doc. But . . . .
I do this in my work as a technical writer. I deal with so much data and information - I’m often worried of losing crucial bits in an attempt to make my finished product lean. So I keep certain things in a separate doc for post-editing in case I need to add back in.
For every product I’m working on I have a secondary doc I call “the bench”. I usually save it permanently along side the final version so that I can go back and pull from my “bench” for future work.
Absolutely! Those snippets may resurface in piece from which it was cut (maybe it was just mid-placed), or it could be the genesis of another piece, or it might even be a flash piece with some tweaking!
Agreed but also; what if you trusted your writing so much that you know whatever you write next will be better? Although your pov at any given time is always unique to that moment so there's that too. Just arguing both sides "out loud" on here, carry on! 😅
This is a much more organized version of what I do, which is individually email myself everything I take out of a document with some cryptic subject line I mistakenly believe I’ll be able to identify it by later
It's not at all weird! Those words and phrases came to you for a purpose and one day you might need them for inspiration or to round off a thought! And yes I have a dump file too.
i always do this when i'm writing essays... i call it my 'out takes' file, like the film editing process. some of that stuff finds a great place later or inspires a new essay.
This is so smart. In my creative writing I have a version of this which is saving old drafts with notes about what i cut in the new drafts so I can find if needed
It's not weird at all, it's prudent and reassuring. I've found it useful in all writing but especially fiction. The contours of the plot become clearer as you rewrite, so often bits that were too long or didn't quite fit originally can find new, better places.
I have multiple scraps files, and sometimes I do in fact dig around for some paragraph or passage that hadn't found the right spot yet. How can that be weird??
Yes, it’s my, “I know this needs to be removed for clarity and brevity, but it’s funny/insightful/valuable and they really don’t deserve it if they can’t appreciate it. Who do they think they are?!” file. 😂
Not only do I do this, but on my last script I literally actually really used something I had put in the junk drawer several days/a week earlier. It saved me!
Oui oui!! And mine are labeled almost as badly as the infamous 'final.doc', 'final2.doc', 'actualfinal.doc', 'imeanitthistimefinal.doc', 'finalfinal.doc', 'finalprint.doc', 'finalprint2.doc', ad nauseam, as I do it for different drafts!
I want to do it, but I don't. Deleting stuff forever is more important than anything else to me, or I lost clarity and meaning in what I'm doing. At least it's my impression.
The only thing weird is that someone doesn’t think different people have different processes. The end result is what should be judged, not how you got there.
Definitely. You never know when you are going to need that perfectly crafted sentence that doesnt quite fit anywhere else. Also your descendents can publish it posthumously for the scholars to study.
Having a dump/scraps document made editing my master thesis less painful. Now I always use one anytime I have to write something.
Besides, one projects’s trash is another project’s treasure
I do this, too! I have a chaotic system where I just highlight bits in the script (I make comics) it and mark it as "useful for later" but maybe I should take it out and put it into another document...
Yes, I save things under different drafts as I go along. If I change it significantly I save under a new name. When I was at uni tho I learnt how to plan to word counts so rarely have much to remove.
All the time! It's the equivalent of writing notes in the margin of a piece of paper you'd write on. For short correspondences I put them at the bottom where I can see them, use and edit them and DELETE before sending! Little more risky in same doc but definitely works for me
I put that stuff at the bottom of documents I write and then either delete or move that writing to a drafts page. Have used that stuff on other writing after the fact.
Snippets in other saved documents, plus half thought out ideas after a page break at the end of my main draft. I also save my main draft in successive versions so i might have 4 or 5 b4 I'm done. I don't delete them after whatever I'm writing is finalized; why take the time?
Indeed. SOP for every publishing project I've ever worked on--manual or digital production. There are numerous justifications to archive revisions, not least of which disagreement between (real and imaginary) editors.
Apparently, you're supposed to cut it in half, put one half on a plate, unpeeled, sprinkle it with sugar, and then eat it with a spoon. The guy berating me had NEVER seen a grapefruit eaten any other way. I think we must have come from different social classes or something. 🤷♂️
or maybe it was just a regional thing. For instance, until I was 25, I never thought of crawdads as being anything but bait for catching bass. Then I went to New Orleans where they were called 'crayfish', and people ate them by the pound!
I wouldnt dream of eating a grapefruit. However the only way I've ever seen them eaten is halved on a plate, covered in sugar and using a grapefruit spoon with serrated edges.
Yes, it has come to my attention over the years that this is really the default method. I must have grown up in a bubble. I thought it was just the sugar that mitigated the bitterness though. Anyway, I kind of like that bitter tang, so not an issue for me.
BTW, what's the deal with so many medicines that forbid grapefruit? If it was all one family of medications that would be one thing, but I see the warning on all different kinds of medicines. You seem like the person to ask. 🤔
What she said. 👆🏼The compounds in grapefruit juice block the action of the enzymes that the body uses to break down drugs. Without the enzymes, you end up with toxic drug levels.
I create dump and back-up documents fairly regularly. I am told that is one of the advantages of cloud-based document management - every version is saved.
I do this! I have a file called "Chaff". Any writing cut from any document goes in there. Sometimes, entirely new pieces spin off of stuff I cut from earlier work. Excellent practice.
Do the same. Version and archive old notes and ideas. Story structure can change. It's inevitable during the editing process. Old ideas may be more viable down the line.
I don’t think it’s dumb! I do it on the same doc, though - I just hit enter a few times to physically and mentally separate it from my new copy, but so it’s right there to grab bits and pieces as needed.
I save multiple versions of different drafts.
Copy, paste, and then cut out whatever I don't want and work with what's left.
If I need something from an earlier draft, I just go back to it - copy and paste. But I'm beggining to thnk this promotes laziness instead of fresh ideas
for me its not journalism or academic writing but for building presentations. I keep a stack of pages at the end of my document... there's a point beyond which you enter the GRAVEYARD of ideas 💀
Yes, frequently. When writing, especially creative writing, the worst of all worlds is to discard a section, then realise ten days later that it was actually rather better than what you decided to replace it with... A dump file is a great idea and can always be deleted later.
Scrivener is good for keeping parts of text and older versions. Unfortunately, most of my work is collaborative and we default to google docs which has a lot less functionalities
Not weird at all! I encourage all of our authors to keep one. That’s good content, even if you can’t use it right now. It can turn into other things: articles, essays, lead gen (bonus chapters!), your next book. The path isn’t always clear, so leave yourself the breadcrumbs!
“Cut words” file for every major project. I never delete words—I might want them later!
If your hard drive is too small to contain your cut words, get a bigger hard drive.
YES, especially at work. Well be in the middle of some complex motion, draft no. 5, and boss will say, "Put the part back that has the quote from Enzius v. Texas" that we deleted three drafts ago. Gotta have a cut file. No reason not to use one in regular writing too.
Yep, you just never know how discarded paragraphs or partial thoughts can be re-incorporated into your work at a later time. Used to do it all the time when I was writing papers for school. A good writer has an obligation to themselves to preserve what they've written.
Yes, but it's called the 'paragraph graveyard' or 'slide graveyard' (for presentations), and i have needed to reanimate them sometimes, so very much worth it.
I use Notepad++ which gives you multiple tabs and removes formatting, so I can have 7 different paragraphs in 7 different tabs, slice and dice how I want and come back later. Saves all without “committing” too. Very useful.
Absolutely. Sometimes those thoughts just need to bake longer. And besides, you have work in your own way. I once had a prof that printed out what he’d written cut each sentence out and play with like a puzzle.The tactile practice really helped him. It would drive me nutty. 🤷🏻♀️
Thats brilliant, google docs essentially does that for you with version history but what if you want to pulling from place A and then move it to place B later
I used to do this too! I could never quite get comfortable with deleting things -- always wondered if I might need it later. 😂 So I'd put anything I removed in a separate document called [Filename]_offcuts and saved it in the same folder as my drafts and other notes.
That's a different document! It contains things that literally don't belong anywhere, like the opening sentence "Emma was sitting at the breakfast table, feeding her cold" that badly needs a story to go with it but doesn't have one yet.
This actually sounds like a brilliant idea. There are times where something doesn’t fit. But later and in a different place? I find myself trying to recapture the way I worded something and I’m always kicking myself for deleting.
It also makes it so much easier to cut when you need to cut. Because if the cut is bad, you can put it back. (I almost never do put things back, but every now and then I do.)
I call mine snippets and deleted scenes. Sometimes I pull phrases or entire conversations to paste back in and revise to fit the situation my characters must face.
I don’t do this exactly but I keep saved copies of all of my draft screenplays in case I want to go back to how things were. But I really like this idea and I might start!
I always do this. Takes the sting out of cutting material; you're not killing it, you're just removing it... probably forever but that's a separate topic, right?!
Yes. Totally. But I also use versions - so when I am going to take something major out - I save as a new version so I have the text of the old version - in case I need it.
I do! Actually, in whatever application I’m using, I insert a line or page break at the end of the document and throw any unused text there. That section is always much larger than the finished product. And of course, I’ll never use any of it “some other time”
sounds completely normal to me - i used to do it in notebooks before i had a computer, and i probably still have disks somewhere with all sorts of bits on...
Scrivener makes this so easy! I have folders for cut scenes in the extra section of my binder where I have all my research notes, ideas for future scenes, etc.
Yeah, but also because I tend to write very nonlinearly. So, sometimes I discover I've written something for later/earlier/between some scenes/for another story. I call it an "in progress" document, and occasionally purge those things that I read later and know won't work.
All the time. All of my excel files have tabs of the previous data before I pare it down as well, then I just take the final iteration and put it in a fresh workbook lol
I save each draft as a new document before I make changes so I can keep the stuff I might need later. But, a dump document sounds more accessible. Good idea!
I have at least 5 unnamed dump documents that Notepad++ just keeps in memory because I refuse to name them! 😂
And then I have dump documents saved as Word files on Google Drive because they're more long-term "I might need this"
Absolutely! I do it all the time. Nothing worse than - "Oh hey, I think I already wrote this!" and losing that piece. Especially if you know the first version was better
My pal Steve and I do it a lot when we're writing and recording music. We call it the scrapyard. Every so often something lovely emerges ! Unclwallyandunclesteve.bandcamp.com
I start a new draft anytime I think I'm going to do something major. It just gives me permission emotionally to discard work that doesn't do what it was supposed to.
Absolutely! I've had it before where I was asked to make revisions/expansions to a submitted article, only to handily have just the relevant part within my "cut text" doc.
I do this using versions. If I want to reincorporate something I’ve cut, I go back to the version that had it. Don’t think it’s weird to do it your way. Whatever works
I do it all the time! It's hard when you find exactly the perfect quote or reference but it doesn't fit in what you're working on right then. So you park it and use it later.
Close: I have a little section at the end of each draft called "Notes and fragments" where I'll jot out thoughts for the direction of a work at the end of the day and hold on to pieces that were interesting or well-written but didn't work with the direction I ended up taking.
I do. The one for the WIP has something like 111k words in it, and I've referred back to it later when I realized I just wanted to move something, not delete it.
Seems to me like a better idea would be to cross out sections you don't want but leave them in the original file, then when you're happy. Save a copy of the file elsewhere, remove all the crossed out sections, doublecheck the paper then save as final version.
100% I do this. If I cared enough to use LaTeX, regularly, it would be much easier b/c could just his the code in place...and this is the only reason I’ve considered using LaTeX regularly.
Not only do I do this, but I actively encouraged my college comp and lit students to do this. It’s hard to let go of our darlings. Giving them a different place to live allows us to be more thorough in our revision.
Mine is called 'darlings' (as in 'murder your darlings'). I'll never use that text again, but the file makes it possible to move on with minimal angst.
I have a dump document for every paper/manuscript/chapter! It’s so useful for picking back up on ideas later. AND it helps avoid forcing things into one paper because you don’t want to delete them.
I do something similar. I first dump all my ideas and then I try to assemble them into something more coherent. We've even built a whole note-taking tool around this :)
Yes, a big part of my writing process! I also save each update of the document I work on as a separate file. I often go back and use content from the "dump" file or previous drafts.
Yes!! Any time I write something longer than a few pages. And it’s never not come in handy, so I totally stand by this as an integral component of the writing process.
Yes. I do the same also for reference material, collating it in subject tabs. This is also for problematic individuals so that I can track issues over time.
How can you delete paragraphs so boldly without this? They have to be there in case I change my mind, which I may never do but still, this file is a must.
Is this doc just for that doc you're working on? Or do u have each doc have it's own dump file? I've literally written 10 pages of my book, but I KEEP EVERYTHING. I need a system.
Absolutely. Sometimes it guts me to cut out a phrase I think sings, so I save it in that other doc in case I’m able to rework it or bring it back another time.
I use Google Keep for these and tag them as snippets. There's things I write in the moment that are great but not right fit the doc, so I save them for later.
Every time I sit down to write or make some substantial change, I make a copy of the chapter I'm working on, leaving me a long trail of old drafts and revisions.
It's not weird. It's smart. I do the same thing & have used it many times. You have every right to your process that works for you & the opinions of these other people do not matter. You do you!❤
Ummm....yes. And then I find it two to three years later and usually wonder what the fuck I was thinking. Goes both ways, too, as in, "wtf was I thinking cutting this marvelous prose" and "wtf was I thinking when I saved this dreck."
Who doesn't? Sometimes I need to excise something, save it close by, sometimes it's just adding white space and seeing if it works better. I usually just do this at the bottom of my document tho
I do this and it’s also known as my ‘dump doc’ 😂 it’s full of things I’ve written that I can’t delete but need to get rid of to stay under my word count!
Not weird at all! I have a friend who calls hers "My Dead Darlings." I call mine "Deleted Scenes." I have rescued a thing or two and recycled it in other pieces, so totally useful -- and NOT WEIRD.
I just type-diarrhea my notes down, then if I ever get back to pretty then up I leave the garbage confusing stuff at the bottom of my one note most of the time
Started doing it in college 20 years ago! First I dump the cut items at the end of the document. When I’m totally done I cut the rejects and paste them into a separate document. You never know when you’ll need it.
It's essential.
Though I use a personal wiki rather than a "document" because you can organize the fragments on different pages and easily link between them.
Just do proper version control - start with your original (V1.0), corrections saved as V1.x (you can even subdivide into V1.1.x as you go through chapters/headings) until you are ready to proof read.
Then you start V2.0 etc...🙄
Yes definitely, it's the only way I can cut pieces I like and can't bear to get rid of. I rarely re-use them but it's easier than deleting them forever 💚
I save every cut scene as a separate file in a "cut scenes" folder and name it with what happens in the scene to find it quickly. Indo this also with good bits.
I did early on, but I never went back to the file so ended up dropping it. Now I double outline (chapter and scene) so I’m less likely to write something unusable.
It’s not weird! Lots of people do it (including me).
Personally, I find it helps me to press delete if I know I could put the words back or recycle them elsewhere
I do this too if I've gone wayyy over a word count. And also if it's an editor I've never worked with I save the original draft in case they fuck up my flow.
I do the same. It exists at the end of my documents and I call it the Graveyard. And then I "resurrect" things from the graveyard if I find I can use them. I rarely need this act of divine reincarnation but it makes it easier to let dead sentences or paragraphs rest in peace.
Yes. Did that especially through my masters! Quotes never lost. It was really useful to have a google dump document where you could dump and save automatically and helped massively during my dissertation to remind me of working on other assignments etc!