Convopage
See the entire conversation
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
1/ Are tech companies too big, powerful? Need to be “controlled”? Where’s Gov? Some thoughts on maturing companies…
Are Facebook, Google and Amazon too big? Why that question keeps coming up
We love our Facebook friends, Google searches and Amazon sprees, but a growing group - from consumers to politicians on the left and right - worry.
usatoday.com
25 replies and sub-replies as of Sep 27 2017
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
2/ Maturing Cos “run up against” many issues: market power, consumer protection, regulatory oversight, taxes, employees (salary, promos)…
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
3/ What is interesting to me is tech companies born of the network era, benefitting enormously from structural benefits of networks also…
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
4/ They see networks greatly accelerate the level of visibility, scrutiny on the maturing process. Each generation sees this half the time!
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
5/ Big IBM history buff. As MSFT matured began to notice issues IBM faced internally and externally “hit” MS too, but in half the time.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
6/ Anti-trust, question about innovation, Europe expansion Employee satisfaction/oppty and more. What took IBM 20 years too Microsoft 10.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
7/ Then I started to see this with google. Anti-trust started in half the time it took MS (half IBM). Employee issues, peak innovation, etc.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
8/ This is the case for internal issues as well. MS was 15 years into company before internal questions from employee base about key topics.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
9/ Today we see FB a few short years as a company, most networked company ever, facing maturing issues. Half the time: govt, biz model, etc.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
10/ My view,—an exponential effect because of network effects AND just part of maturing Co. Any view of history shows how normal this is.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
11/ Very networks and transparency created by modern companies also creates climate of “mature more quickly” that all can see/transparency.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
12/ Historically extraction/manufacturing companies all went through this but w/o networks, visibility was limited to experts.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
13/ Maturing management, awareness in achieving some success, empathy of impact, and more come with a maturing management team.
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
14/ Every great Co goes through this. Isn’t some new thing because of tech or exclusive to it. Transition from “keep the wheels on” is real…
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
15/ It is new/critical to many people right now and the scope of networked companies is larger, but IBM > USS, MS > IBM, etc. // END
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
PS/ Have we have reached peak “exponential maturing” because most of the world is now networked? Interesting to think about.
Prady Misra
@pradym
Whenever we (humankind) reach a peak we discover numerous more peaks to be climbed. Can't see them till then. True in every field.
Jeremy Diamond
@Jer_Diamond
Hope so. Can’t be answering questions about antitrust when you’re still in a WeWork.
Saku 🚀
@sknthla
How strange. As we pick low-hanging fruit, it gets harder to find innovations - but what we've already built means they win much faster.
BJ Malicoat
@bmalicoat
Speaking of network effects, if you got Twitter’s bump to 280 you could have communicated your thoughts in half the time 👀
🍪Steven Sinofsky ॐ
@stevesi
I was so going to make that joke!
Madhav
@DataScientest
And now this....
Corporate Consolidation: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Big businesses are getting even bigger thanks to a rise in corporate mergers. John Oliver explains why that could make you want to physically destroy your ca...
youtube.com
Blair Reeves
@BlairReeves
The irony is that IBM was more of a monopoly than either for a long time (until Google in its core area)
Prady Misra
@pradym
Toffler's Law?
Prady Misra
@pradym
Laws and regulations always trail the innovations. While sensible regulations e.g. re: privacy etc. is useful, "controlling" them is not
Jim Zellmer
@jimzellmer
There are varying degrees of “influence”. See Eric Schmidt and changes in Goog lobbying $ spend.