For years, we’ve reassured people that no, Apple doesn’t secretly slow down their older iPhones to make them buy new ones.
If this must be done, it should be a setting. If it’s on by default, the user should be alerted the first time it happens.
I can only image the number of class action lawsuits that will come from this. People thought they needed to buy a $500 phone when maybe they only needed to replace a $100something battery.
Framing question: Why are we denying planned obsolescence? Everything becomes obsolete, doesn't planning on that eventuality increase the efficiency and the value we can extract from a product?
I plan on replacing a phone every 1 to 2 years. My non tech family does not. They expect a $600+ device to last 4 to 5 years and anything less is a money grab.
Granted. But isn't the "devices should never down" argument a bit absolutist? It's fair to want devices that last longer - that's a problem that engineers can solve with better materials and by making tradeoffs.
Certainly. I don't disagree. Looking at it through the lens of the average consumer, they won't see it that way. And generally (and I do acknowledge this is a broad statement), those of us tech minded/interested folks are going to come off sounding like Apple apologists.
Simple: if your battery is very old and you do something that uses too much processing power (like running CPU benchmarks), your phone will slow for a moment to protect its electronics and prevent a shutdown, making your phone last longer. It doesn’t slow your phone all the time.
Samsung called. They say they’re still selling the Note. And the Note7 literally exploded and was banned from air flight. I think the reputation hit probably won’t matter that much for this.
I'm super curious about this -- My iPhone 6 has been extremely slow since the last few updates, but I paid the $79 battery replacement fee last January. Surely a phone with a 1-year old battery isn't falling into this group, right?
Apple definitely didn’t leak the story to Mark Gurman about cross-platform development unification in order to soften the blow of this news today. Nope.
Even worse, has anyone been sitting around saying “but at least my phone lasts all day”? I feel like the older phones still die as quickly or quicker with this power saving.
Linger, yes, but only in the minds of trolls who like to find fault with Apple.
The reality is, non-nerds don’t know or care.
Samsung remains one of the most popular brands despite selling phones that caught fire *1 generation* ago.
This is the most minor of issues.
As someone who had a phone that unexpectedly shut down with 30+% battery life, I can assure you that the alternative to this is much worse and that I’m fine with the compromise.
This isn’t just for old iPhones. It’s for all iPhones. The 8 and x will get this sooner than later. I think it’s to improve device longevity and performance not force users to buy new phones.
100%, if user sees that their battery life is short, they would know that their battery is the issue. if iPhone slows down, they would think that getting new iPhone would be the solution- when its actually the battery
It’s not really to make them buy new ones, it’s to make the old ones last a bit longer. If batteries were more easily replaceable, then this wouldn’t be necessary.
when iPhones slow down, customers think that getting new iPhone is the solution, but when iPhones die faster, they directly know that replacing battery is the solution
Tim: Investors don’t come before customers. Conduct a recall. Recall the iPhone 6es with the ‘screen doesn’t recognize touches unless device is bent’ issue too.
I've often wondered if there's something weird about iPhone battery decisions; they seem mildly more vulnerable to cold and stuff than other manufacturer's phones.
A recall - I’m sorry, repair extension - seems pretty reasonable actually. Throttling the CPU seems like it should have just been a stop gap while they figured out how to address the battery issue.
Just yesterday I laughed at a cousin at our family party who insisted he was holding out on updating his phone’s OS to avoid the “forced slow down” by Apple. 😐
If it’s using available peak current to throttle load then that could trigger even on brand new phones if they get too cold or battery is very low. A way of checking battery cycle age and suggesting replacement would be less confusing.
Battery health should absolutely be a setting in iOS. Even if it’s not completely accurate it should give users some idea if they need to replace or not.
Will never happen. They better force people into buying a new iPhone instead of letting people decide for themselves. Same way they do by disabling Flashlight on iPhone 6 when battery is below 10%. They have no shame.